I am mainly interested in the phenomena of epistemic corruption, the history of reflection on epistemic vices, collective epistemic vices and epistemically vicious collectives, and the methodology of vice epistemology.

• A paper on vice-charging.

• A paper on epistemic myopia.

​

• ‘Multidimensionalism, Resistance, and the Demographic Problem’, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 19.1 (2023).

 

• ‘Corrupted Temporalities, ‘Cultures of Speed’, and the Possibility of Collegiality’, Gerry Dunne (ed.), Reimagining Epistemic Injustice, special issue of Educational Philosophy and Theory 55:3 (2023), 330-342.*

 

• ‘Character, Corruption, and ‘Cultures of Speed’ in the Academy’, Áine Mahon (ed.), The Promise of the University: Reclaiming Humanity, Humility, and Hope (Dordrecht: Springer 2022), 17-28.*​

​

• ‘Comments on Alessandra Tanesini’s “Mindshaping and Intellectual Virtues”’, Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2022), 161-164.*

 

• ‘Comments on C. Thi Nguyen’s “Playfulness versus Epistemic Traps”’, Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2022), 291-293.*

 

• ‘From Vice Epistemology to Critical Character Epistemology’, Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2022), 84-102.* 

 

• ‘Epistemic Corruption and the Research Impact Agenda’, co-authored with Jenn Chubb and Joshua Forstenzer, Theory and Research in Education 19.2 (2021: 148-167.

 

• ‘Character, Corruption, and ‘Cultures of Speed’ in the Academy’, Áine Mahon (ed.), The Promise of the University: Reclaiming Humanity, Humility, and Hope (Dordrecht: Springer 2022), 17-28.​​*
  
  
• ‘A Case for an Historical Vice Epistemology’, Laura Candiotto (ed.), The Social Dimension of the Ethics of Knowledge: Intellectual Virtues and Intellectual Vices in Epistemic Practices, a special issue of Humana.Mente 14.39(2021): 69-86.*

​

• 'Epistemic Corruption and Political Institutions', Michael Hannon and Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Political Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2021), 347-358.*

 

• 'Mathematical Practice and Epistemic Virtue and Vice', co-authored with Fenner Tanswell, Synthese 199 (2021): 407-426.

  

• 'Martial Metaphors and Argumentative Virtues and Vices', Alessandra Tanesini and Michael Lynch (eds.) Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2021), 25-38.*

 

• Vice Epistemology, co-edited with Quassim Cassam and Heather Battaly (New York: Routledge, 2020).
  • 'From Bad Thinking to Vice Epistemology', Imperfect Cognitions, 20 October 2020.*

 

• 'Introduction: From Epistemic Vices to Vice Epistemology', co-authored with Quassim Cassam and Heather Battaly in our (eds.), Vice Epistemology: Theory and Practice (New York: Routledge, 2020), 1-17.

 

• 'Epistemic Corruption and Social Oppression', Ian James Kidd, Quassim Cassam, and Heather Battaly (eds.), Vice Epistemology: Theory and Practice (New York: Routledge, 2020), 69-86.

 

• 'Epistemic Vices and Feminist Philosophies of Science', Kristen Intemann and Sharon Crasnow (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Feminist Philosophy of Science (New York: Routledge, 2020), 157-169*

​ 

• 'From the Vicious Mind to the Scientific Mind', De Filosoof 79 (2020): 28-32.*

 

• ​'Epistemic Corruption and Education', Episteme 16.2 (2019): 220-235.​

 

• ​'Deep Epistemic Vices', ​Journal of Philosophical Research 43 (2018): 43-67.*
  • ​​​Special issue on epistemic vice.

 

• 'Epistemic Courage and the Harms of Epistemic Life', Heather Battaly (ed.), The Routledge Handbook to Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2018), 244-255.*

 

• 'Hubris as Prime Ministerial Vice', Open for Debate blog, 31 July 2017.*

 

• 'Capital Epistemic Vices', Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6.8 (2017): 11-16.
  • Quassim Cassam, 'Vice Ontology', Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 20-27.

​

• 'Cranks, Pluralists, and Epistemic Vices', Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6(7) (2017): 7-9.

 

• ‘Is Scientism Epistemically Vicious?’, Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.) Scientism: Prospects and Problems (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 222-249.

 

• ‘Epistemic Vices in Public Debate: The Case of ‘New Atheism’’, Christopher Cotter, Philip Quadrio, and Jonathan Tuckett (eds.), New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates (Dordrecht: Springer, 2017), 51-68.*

 

• 'Epistemic Corruption and Manufactured Doubt: The Case of Climate Science', co-authored with Justin Biddle and Anna Leuschner, Public Affairs Quarterly 31.3 (2017): 165-187.
  • Special issue: Responsible Use of Science in Societal Decision-Making, ed. Kevin C. Elliott and Ted Richards.

 

• 'Charging Others With Epistemic Vice', The Monist, 99.3 (2016): 181-197.
  • Special issue: Virtues, edited by Mark Alfano.

 

• 'Vice-charging: Calling Out the Vices of the Mind', The Tablet (Biola University Centre for Christian Thought), 28 November 2016.*

 

• ‘Epistemic Vices – Conference Report’, The Reasoner 9.10 (2015): 85-86.* 

 

• ‪‘Aggression, Virtue, and Philosophy’, invited contribution to Manifest Virtue blog, June 2015.