​

Books – edited

• ​Misanthropy: Philosophical Essays, co-edited with Kathryn Norlock, underway.
• Epistemic Vices: From the Individual to the Collective, co-edited with Robin McKenna, underway.
• Vice Epistemology, co-edited with Heather Battaly and Quassim Cassam (New York: Routledge, 2020).
• The Routledge Handbook to Epistemic Injustice, co-edited with José Medina and Gaile Pohlhaus (New York: Routledge: 2017).
  • Amiel Bernal, ‘The Epistemic Injustice Anthology’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6.11 (2017): 1-8.
  • Hana Samaržija, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 2019.
• Wittgenstein and Scientism, co-edited with Jonathan Beale (London: Routledge, 2017).
  • Anna Boncompagni, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 7 July 2018.
  • John Edelman, Philosophical Investigations (2018): 475-480.
  • Mariam Thalos, ‘Philosophy in an Age of Science’, Metascience 28.1 (2019): 51-53. 
  • Ryan Manhire, British Wittgenstein Society Newsletter, 11 January 2019.
• Science and the Self: Animals, Evolution, and Ethics: Essays in Honour of Mary Midgley, co-edited with Elizabeth McKinnell (London: Routledge, 2015). 
  • Marion Hourdequin, Environmental Values 26.1 (2017): 114-116.

 
Edited volumes – journal special issues

• Unconceived Alternatives and Scientific Realism, co-edited with Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam, Synthese 196/10 (2019): 3911–3993.
• Reappraising Feyerabend, co-edited with Matthew Brown, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57 (2016).
• Historiography and the Philosophy of the Sciences, co-edited with Robin Hendry, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 55 (2016).
• Mystery and Humility, co-edited with Guy Bennett-Hunter, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4/3 (2012).

 
Journal articles

Forthcoming

• ‘Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatric Research and Practice’, co-authored with Lucienne Spencer and Havi Carel, Philosophical Psychology, forthcoming, DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2022.2156333.
• 'Individual Vices and Institutional Failings as Drivers of Vulnerabilisation', co-authored with Havi Carel, Social Epistemology, forthcoming.* (Special issue on Epistemic Injustice in the Medical Context, edited by Rena Goldstein.).

Published 

• 'Feyerabend on Human Life, Abstraction, and the "Conquest of Abundance", Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 61.3 (2024) 1-27. Special issue: “Science in a Free Society. On Paul Feyerabend’s Intellectual Legacy”. Edited by Olga E. Stoliarova.*
• 'Is Intellectual Humility Compatible with Political Conviction?', co-authored with Michael Hannon, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 27.2 (2024): 211-233.​
• ‘Religion, Psychiatry, and “Radical” Epistemic Injustice’, co-authored with Rosa Ritunnano, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 31.3 (2024): 235-238. (Special issue: Religious Experience and Psychpatlogy, edited by Mohammed Abouelleil Rashed).*
• ‘Corrupted Temporalities, ‘Cultures of Speed’, and the Possibility of Collegiality’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 55:3 (2023), 330-342.*​ (Special issue, Reimagining Epistemic Injustice, special issue, edited by Gerry Dunne).​
• ‘Correspondence: Epistemic Injustice Should Matter to Psychiatrists’, co-authored with Lucienne Spencer and Eleanor Harris, Philosophy of Medicine 4.1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5195/pom.2023.159.​
• ‘Feyerabend on Contingency, Pluralism, and Humility’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 20.2 (2023):1-22, (Special issue on Feyerabend’s Legacy, edited by Kazimierz Jodkowski, Gonzalo Munévar, Krzysztof J. Kilian, and Grzegorz Malec).*

• ‘From Vices to Corruption to Misanthropy’, TheoLogica 7.2 (2023).* 
  • Special issue on Vice and Sin edited by Michele Paolini Paoletti and Maria Silvia Vaccarezza.​
• ‘Political Conviction, Intellectual Humility, and Quietism’, co-authored with Michael Hannon, Journal of Positive Psychology 18.2 (2023): 233-236.*
• ’The Hermeneutic Problem of Psychiatry’ and the Co-production of Meaning in Psychiatric Healthcare’, co-authored with Lucienne Spencer, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 94 (2023): 103-131.
  • Special issue on Lived Experience and Co-production in Philosophy and Mental Health, edited by Anna Bergqvist, David Crepaz-Keay and Alana Wilde.​
• ‘Metaphilosophical Myopia and the Ideal of Expansive Pluralism’​, Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (2023): 1025-1040. (Special issue: Epistemic Injustice: Complicity and Promise in Education, edited by Alex Nikolaidis and Winston C. Thompson).
• ‘Multidimensionalism, Resistance, and the Demographic Problem’, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 19.1 (2023).
• 'Feyerabend and Marx', co-authored with Rory Kent, for Stefano Gattei and Roberta Corvi (eds.), Feyerabend in Dialogue, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Springer, 2024), forthcoming.*
• ​‘Political Conviction, Intellectual Humility, and Quietism’, co-authored with Michael Hannon, Journal of Positive Psychology 18:2 (2023): 233-236, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2155230.*​

• ‘Institutional Opacity, Epistemic Vulnerability, and Institutional Testimonial Justice’, co-authored with Havi Carel, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29.4 (2022): 473-496.
  • Winner of the PEriTiA Prize of the 2020 IJPS Robert Papazian essay competition on the theme ‘Testimonial Injustice and Trust’, funded by the UCD Centre for Ethics in Public Life.
  • Reprinted in Melanie Altanian and Maria Baghramian (ed.) Testimonial Injustice and Trust (London: Routledge, 2022/23).

• ‘A Case for an Historical Vice Epistemology’, Humana.Mente 14.39 (2021): 69-86.* (Special issue. The Social Dimension of the Ethics of Knowledge: Intellectual Virtues and Intellectual Vices in Epistemic Practices, edited by Laura Candiotto).
• ‘Creativity in Science and the ‘Anthropological Turn’ in Virtue Theory’, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11.15 (2021): 1-16.
  • Special issue on Creativity in Art, Science & Mind, edited by Adrian Currie and Anton Killin.
• ‘Epistemic Corruption and the Research Impact Agenda’, co-authored with Jenn Chubb and Joshua Forstenzer, Theory and Research in Education 19.2 (2021: 148-167.
• 'Mathematical Practice and Epistemic Virtue and Vice', co-authored with Fenner Tanswell, Synthese 199 (2021): 407-426.
• ‘Knowing What to Order at the Conference Dinner’, Outsiders Within: Reflections on Being a Low-Income and/or First-Generation Philosopher, The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 20: 2 (2021): 19-21.
• 'Reloading the Canon', The Philosopher's Magazine 93 (2021): 57-63.*​​
  • ​This article has also been translated into Chinese by Wu Wanwei.
• ​‘The Predicament of Patients’, co-authored with Havi Carel, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 89 (2021): 65-84.
• ‘Varieties of Philosophical Misanthropy’, Journal of Philosophical Research 46 (2021): 27-44.
• ‘Animals, Misanthropy, and Humanity’, Journal of Animal Ethics 10.1 (2020): 66–72. (Essay review of David E. Cooper, Animals and Misanthropy, 2018).
• ‘“Following the Way of Heaven”: Exemplarism, Emulation, and Daoism’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6.1 (2020): 1-15.  (Selected by the Editors for the JAPA Special Series in Non-Western Philosophy).
• ‘Daoism, Humanity, and the Way of Heaven’, Religious Studies 56 (2020): 111–126.* (Special issue on Philosophy of Religions: Cross-cultural, Multi-religious Perspectives, edited by Mikel Burley).​
• ‘Humankind, Human Nature, and Misanthropy’, Metascience 29 (2020): 505–508. (Essay review of Rutger Bregman, Humankind: A Hopeful History (2020)).
• ‘Pandemic Transformative Experiences’, co-authored with Havi Carel, The Philosophers’ Magazine 90 (2020): 24-31.​
• 'Pandemic, Pessimism, and Misanthropy', American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 20.1 (2020): 34-36. ​(Fall 2020 special issue on Feminist Responses to Pandemics and Covid-19).
• ‘Private Schools and ‘Queue-jumping’’, co-authored with Mark Jago, Journal for Philosophy of Education54.5 (2020): 1201-1205.
• ‘Trade-offs, Backfires, and Curricular Diversification’, Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 7.2 (2020): 179-193. (Special issue on Diversity in Philosophy, edited by Helen Beebee and Anne-Marie McCallion).
• ‘Admiration, Attraction, and the Aesthetics of Exemplarity’, Journal of Moral Education 48.3 (2019): 369-380.* (Special issue on Exemplars and Education, edited by Angelo Campodonico, Maria Silvia Vaccarezza, and Michel Croce.)
• ‘Epistemic Corruption and Education’, Episteme 16.2 (2019): 220-235.
• ‘Expanding Transformative Experience’, co-authored with Havi Carel, European Journal of Philosophy 28.1 (2019): 199-213.
• ‘Narratives of Adversity and Wisdom in Ancient Ethical and Spiritual Texts’, co-authored with Will Kynes, Laura E. R. Blackie, and Kate C. McLean, Journal of Value Inquiry 53.3 (2019): 459-461.
• ‘Pathophobia, Illness, and Vices’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27.2 (2019): 286-306.
• ‘Scientism and the ‘Soul of Philosophy’’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11) (2019): 52-54. 
• ‘Adversity, Wisdom, and Exemplarity’, Journal of Value Inquiry (2018) 52: 379–393. 
• ‘Deep Epistemic Vices’, Journal of Philosophical Research 43 (2018): 43-67.
• ‘Feyerabend, Pluralism, and Parapsychology’, Bulletin of the Parapsychological Association10.1 (2018): 5-9.*
• ‘Naturalism, Healthcare Practice, and Epistemic Injustice’, co-authored with Havi Carel, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (2018): 1-23.*
• ‘Spiritual Exemplars’, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79.4 (2018): 420-424.
• ‘Beautiful Bodhisattvas: The Aesthetics of Religious Exemplarity’, Contemporary Buddhism 18.2 (2017): 331-345.
• ‘Capital Epistemic Vices’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6.8 (2017): 11-16.
  • Quassim Cassam, ‘Vice Ontology’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6.11 (2017): 20-27.
• ‘Epistemic Corruption and Manufactured Doubt: The Case of Climate Science’, co-authored with Justin Biddle and Anna Leuschner, Public Affairs Quarterly 31.3 (2017): 165-187. (Special issue: Responsible Use of Science in Societal Decision-Making, ed. Kevin C. Elliott and Ted Richards).
• ‘Epistemic Injustice and Illness’, co-authored with Havi Carel, Journal of Applied Philosophy33(2) (2017): 172-190. (Special issue: Applied Epistemology, ed. David Coady and Miranda Fricker).
• ‘Epistemic Injustice and Psychiatry’, co-authored with Havi Carel and Paul Crichton, British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin 41.2 (2017): 65-70. 
  • Manhal M. Zarroug, Dieneke Hubbeling, and Robert Bertram, ‘Epistemic Injustice or Safety First?’, British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin 41.1 (2017): 56.
  • Sadie Cathcart, ‘Psychiatric diagnosis can lead to epistemic injustice, researchers claim‘, Made in America: Science, Psychiatry, and Social Justice blog, 3 April 2018. 
• ‘Exemplars, Ethics, and Illness Narratives’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38.4 (2017): 323-334.
• ‘Oswald Spengler, Life, and ‘Technics’’, The Berlin Review of Books, 23 November 2017.*
• ‘Other Histories, Other Sciences’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 61 (2017): 57-60.* (Essay review of Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, and Andrew Pickering (eds.), Science as It Could Have Been, 2016).
• ‘Phenomenology of Illness, Philosophy, and Life’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 62 (2017): 56-60.* (Essay review of Havi Carel, Phenomenology of Illness, 2016).
• ‘Resisters, Diversity in Philosophy, and the Demographic Problem’, Rivista di estetica 64 (2017): 119-134. (Special issue: Discrimination in Philosophy, ed. Vera Tripodi).*
• ‘Beauty, Virtue, and Religious Exemplars’, Religious Studies 53 (2017): 171-181.
• ‘Cranks, Pluralists, and Epistemic Vices’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6(7) (2017): 7-9.
• ‘Charging Others with Epistemic Vice’, The Monist 99.3 (2016): 181-197. (Special issue: Virtues, ed. Mark Alfano).
• ‘Feyerabend on Politics, Education, and Scientific Culture’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57 (2016): 121-128.
• ‘Historiography and the Philosophy of the Sciences’, co-authored with Robin Hendry, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 55 (2016): 1-2.
• ‘Illness as Transformative Experience’, co-authored with Havi Carel and Richard Pettigrew, The Lancet 388 (2016): 1152-1153.
• ‘Inevitability, Contingency, and Epistemic Humility’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 55 (2016): 12-19.
• ‘Intellectual Humility, Confidence, and Argumentation’, Topoi 35 (2016): 395-402.
• ‘Reappraising Feyerabend’, co-authored with Matthew Brown, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57 (2016): 1-8.
• ‘Was Feyerabend a Postmodernist?’, International Studies in Philosophy of Science 30.1 (2016): 1-14.
• ‘Why Did Feyerabend Defend Astrology? Integrity, Virtue, and the Authority of Science’, Social Epistemology 30.4 (2016): 464-482.
  • Massimo Pigliucci, ‘Was Feyerabend Right in Defending Astrology? A Commentary on Kidd’, Social Epistemology Reply and Review Collective, 5(5) (2016): 1-6.
  • ‘How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology?’, Social Epistemology Reply and Review Collective, 5(6) (2016): 11-17.
  • Massimo Pigliucci, ‘How Should Feyerabend Have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5(8) (2016): 10-16.
  • Jamie Shaw, ‘Feyerabend and the Cranks: On Demarcation, Epistemic Virtues, and Astrology’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6(3) (2017): 74-88.
  • Massimo Pigliucci, ’Feyerabend and the Cranks: A Reply to Shaw’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6(7) (2016): 1-6.
• ‘Feyerabend’s Against Method—40 Years On’, Metascience, 24.3 (2015): 343-349 (the most-downloaded paper in the journal that year – 3.2% of all downloads).
• ‘Nature, Mystery, and Morality: A Daoist View’, Religious Studies 51.2 (2015): 165-181.
• ‘Transformative Suffering and the Cultivation of Virtue’, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology22.4 (2015), 291-294.
  • Anastasia Philippa Scrutton, ‘Interpretation, Meaning, and the Shaping of Experience’, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 22.4 (2015): 299-301.
• ‘Emotion, Religious Practice, and Cosmopolitan Secularism’, Religious Studies 50.2 (2014): 139-156.
• ‘Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare: A Philosophical Analysis’, co-authored with Havi Carel, Medicine, Healthcare, and Philosophy 17.4 (2014): 529-540. 
• ‘Was Sir William Crookes Epistemically Virtuous?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48A (2014): 67-74.* (Special issue: Psychical Research in the History and Philosophy of Science, ed. Andreas Sommer).
• ‘A Phenomenological Challenge to “Enlightened Secularism”’, Religious Studies 49.3 (2013): 377-398.
• ‘A Pluralist Challenge to ‘Integrative Medicine’: Feyerabend and Popper on the Cognitive Value of Alternative Medicine’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 44.3 (2013): 392–400. 
• ‘Feyerabend on Science and Education’, Journal of Philosophy of Education 47.3 (2013): 407-422.
• ‘Historical Contingency and the Impact of Scientific Imperialism’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27.3 (2013): 317–326.
  • Steve Clarke and Adrian Walsh, ‘Imperialism, Progress, Developmental Teleology, and Interdisciplinary Unification’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27.3 (2014): 341-351.
• ‘Is Naturalism Bleak?’, Environmental Values, 22.6 (2013): 689-702. 
• ‘Science and the Making of Modernity’, Annals of Science 70 (2013): 105-107 (one of the most-read articles of 2013 in the Taylor & Francis set of history of science journals).
• ‘Biopiracy and the Protection of Medical Heritage: The Case of India’s Traditional Knowledge Digital Library’, Journal of Medical Humanities 33 (2012): 175-183. 
• ‘Can Illness be Edifying?’, Inquiry 55.5 (2012): 496-520. 
• ‘Humane Philosophy and the Question of Progress’, Ratio XXV, no. 3 (2012): 277-290. 
• ‘Oswald Spengler, Technology and Human Nature: Man and Technics as Philosophical Anthropology’, The European Legacy 17.1 (2012): 19-31. 
• ‘Receptivity to Mystery’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4.3 (2012): 51-68.
• ‘Feyerabend, Pseudo-Dionysius, and the Ineffability of Reality’, Philosophia 40.2 (2012): 365-377. 
• ‘Objectivity, Abstraction, and the Individual: The Influence of Søren Kierkegaard on Paul Feyerabend’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42.1 (2011): 125-134. (Translated and published in Chinese in World Philosophy 1 (2018)).
• ‘Pierre Duhem’s Epistemic Aims and the Intellectual Virtue of Humility’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42.1 (2011): 185-189 
  • Milena Ivanova, ‘Good Sense in Context: A Reply to Kidd’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42.4 (2011): 610-612.
• ‘Rethinking Feyerabend: The ‘Worst Enemy of Science’?’, PLoS Biology 9.10 (2011): e1001166. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001166. 
• ‘Method in the Madness: Feyerabend’s Philosophical Pluralism’, Metascience 17 (2008): 469-473. (Essay review of Eric Oberheim, Feyerabend’s Philosophy, 2006).

 
Book chapters (* = invited)
Forthcoming 

• 'Confucian Courage in a World Without the Way', Blaine Fowers (ed.), Courage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024), forthcoming.*
• 'Feyerabend and Marx in Dialogue', co-authored with Rory Kent, for Stefano Gattei and Roberta Corvi (eds.), Feyerabend in Dialogue, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Springer, 2024), forthcoming.*
• 'Everyday Aesthetics, Happiness, and Depression', Martin Poltrum, Michael Musalek, Helena Fox, Kathleen Galvin, Yuriko Saito (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Mental Health and Contemporary Western Aesthetics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024), forthcoming.*
• ‘From Predicaments to Pathophobia: Non-ideal Theory Approaches to Philosophy of Illness’, co-authored with Havi Carel, in Hilkje Charlotte Hänel and Johanna Müller (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Non-Ideal Theory (New York: Routledge, 2024), forthcoming.*​
• ‘Gardens of Refuge, Innocence, and Toil’, Yue Zhuang, Alasdair Forbes, and Michael Charlesworth (eds.) The Garden Refuge of Asia and Europe: Paradigms for Dwelling in a Torn World (London: Bloomsbury, 2024/25), forthcoming.*
• 'Pseudoscience after Feyerabend', with Chiara Ambrosio, Anthony Morgan (ed.), Science, Anti-Science, Pseudoscience, Truth (Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Bigg Books, 2024), forthcoming.* (web)
• 'Varieties of Humanism and Conceptions of Science', Anjan Chakravartty (ed.), Science and Humanism (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 2024/25), forthcoming.* 

Published 

• ‘A Pluralist Account of Spiritual Exemplarity’, Victoria Harrison and Tyler McNabb (ed.), Philosophy and the Spiritual Life (London: Routledge, 2023), 92-108.*​
• ‘The Ethics and Epistemology of Deepfakes’, co-authored with Taylor Matthews (first author), in Joe Saunders and Carl Fox (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Media Ethics (New York: Routledge, 2023).*
• 'Institutional Cynicism and Civic Virtue', Hana Samarzija and Quassim Cassam (eds.), ​The Epistemology of Democracy ​(New York: Routledge, 2023), 152-169.* 
• ‘Character, Corruption, and ‘Cultures of Speed’ in the Academy’, Áine Mahon (ed.), The Promise of the University: Reclaiming Humanity, Humility, and Hope (Dordrecht: Springer 2022), 17-28.*​
• ‘Comments on Alessandra Tanesini’s “Mindshaping and Intellectual Virtues”’, Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2022), 161-164.*
• ‘Comments on C. Thi Nguyen’s “Playfulness versus Epistemic Traps”’, Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2022), 291-293.*
• ‘Conceptions of Philosophy and the Challenges of Scientism’, Moti Mizrahi (ed.) Scientism: For and Against (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2022), 75-86.*
• ‘Gardens and the Good Life in Confucianism and Daoism’, Laura D’Olimpio, Panos Paris, Aidan Thompson (eds.), Educating Character Through the Arts (London: Routledge, 2022), 125-139.*​
• ‘From Vice Epistemology to Critical Character Epistemology’, Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2022), 84-102.* 
• ‘Happiness for a Fish: Zhuāngzǐ and Huizi at the Hao River’, Helen de Cruz (ed.), Philosophy Illustrated: 40 Thought Experiments to Broaden your Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 57-60.* 
• 'Misanthropy and the Hatred of Humankind', Noell Birondo (ed.) The Moral Psychology of Hatred (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022), 75-98.*
• ‘Epistemic Corruption and Political Institutions’, Michael Hannon and Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Political Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2021), 347-358.*
• ‘Feyerabend, Science, and Scientism’, Karim Bschir and Jamie Shaw (eds.), Interpreting Feyerabend (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), 172-190.*
• 'Martial Metaphors and Argumentative Virtues and Vices', Alessandra Tanesini and Michael Lynch (eds.) Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2021), 25-38.*
• ‘Epistemic Corruption and Social Oppression’, Ian James Kidd, Heather Battaly and Quassim Cassam (eds.), Vice Epistemology: Theory and Practice, co-edited (New York: Routledge, 2020), 69-87.*
• ‘Introduction: From Epistemic Vices to Vice Epistemology’, Ian James Kidd, Heather Battaly and Quassim Cassam (eds.), Vice Epistemology: Theory and Practice, co-edited (New York: Routledge, 2020), 1-17.*
• ‘Suffering as Transformative Experience’, co-authored with Havi Carel, in David Bain, Michael Brady, and Jennifer Corns (eds.), The Value of Suffering (London: Routledge, 2020), 165-179.*
• ‘Humility, Contingency, and Pluralism in the Sciences’, Mark Alfano, Michael Lynch, and Alessandra Tanesini (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on the Philosophy of Humility (New York: Routledge, 2020), 346-358.*
• ‘Epistemic Vices and Feminist Philosophies of Science’, Kristen Intemann and Sharon Crasnow (eds.) The Routledge Handbook to Feminist Philosophy of Science (New York: Routledge, 2020), 157-169.*
• ‘Pathocentric Epistemic Injustice and Conceptions of Health’, co-authored with Havi Carel, in Ben Sherman and Stacey Goguin (eds.), Overcoming Epistemic Injustice: Social and Perspectives (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2019), 153-168.*
• ‘Phenomenology, Neurology, and Religious Commitment’, Alasdair Coles and and Joanna Collicutt (ed.), Neurology and Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 35-47.*
• ‘Confidence, Humility, and Hubris in Victorian Scientific Naturalism’, Herman Paul and Jeroen van Dongen (eds.), Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Dordrecht: Springer, 2018), 11-25.*
• ‘Confucianism, Curiosity, and Moral Self-Cultivation’, Ilhan Inan, Lani Watson, Dennis Whitcomb, Safiye Yigit (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Curiosity (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018), 97-116.*
• ‘Epistemic Courage and the Harms of Epistemic Life’, Heather Battaly (ed.), The Routledge Handbook to Virtue Epistemology (New York: Routledge, 2018), 244-255.*
• ‘Is Scientism Epistemically Vicious?’, Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.) Scientism: Prospects and Problems (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 222-249.*
• ‘Epistemic Injustice and Religion’, Ian James Kidd, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus (eds.),The Routledge Handbook to Epistemic Injustice (New York: Routledge: 2017), 386-396.
• ‘Epistemic Injustice in Medicine and Healthcare’, co-authored with Havi Carel, in Ian James Kidd, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Epistemic Injustice(New York: Routledge: 2017), 336-346.
• ‘Epistemic Vices in Public Debate: The Case of ‘New Atheism’’, Christopher Cotter, Philip Quadrio, and Jonathan Tuckett (eds.), New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates (Dordrecht: Springer, 2017), 51-68.
• ‘Introduction: Wittgenstein and Scientism’, Jonathan Beale and Ian James Kidd (eds.), Wittgenstein and Scientism (London: Routledge, 2017), 1-6.
• ‘Introduction’, Ian James Kidd, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Epistemic Injustice (New York: Routledge: 2017), 1-9.
• ‘Reawakening to Wonder: Wittgenstein, Feyerabend, and Scientism’, Jonathan Beale and Ian James Kidd (eds.), Wittgenstein and Scientism (London: Routledge, 2017), 101-115.
• ‘“What’s So Great about Science?” Feyerabend on Science, Ideology, and the Cold War’, Elena Aronova and Simone Turchetti (eds.), Science Studies during the Cold War and Beyond(Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2016), 55-76.*
• ‘Educating for Intellectual Humility’, Jason Baehr (ed.), Intellectual Virtues and Education: Essays in Applied Virtue Epistemology (London: Routledge, 2015), 54-70.*
• ‘Introduction’, Ian James Kidd and Elizabeth McKinnell (eds.), Science and the Self: Animals, Evolution, and Ethics: Essays in Honour of Mary Midgley (London: Routledge, 2015), 1-15.
• ‘Doing Science an Injustice: Midgley on Scientism’, Ian James Kidd and Elizabeth McKinnell (eds.), Science and the Self: Animals, Evolution, and Ethics: Essays in Honour of Mary Midgley (London: Routledge, 2015), 151-167.
• ‘Feyerabend on the Ineffability of Reality’, Asa Kasher and Jeanne Diller (eds.), Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities, (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2013), 849-859.*
• ‘Oswald Spengler’, Gregory Claey (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Modern Political Thought (Washington DC: CQ Press, 2013).*

 
Bibliographical work

• ‘Epistemic Injustice, Healthcare, and Illness’.
• ‘The Works of Mary Midgley’, Ian James Kidd and Elizabeth McKinnell (eds.), Science and the Self: Animals, Evolution, and Ethics: Essays in Honour of Mary Midgley (London: Routledge, 2015), 233-243.

 
Other publications ​

• ‘Human Limitedness and the Virtues’, contribution to a symposium on David McPherson’s The Virtues of Limits, Cosmos + Taxis, forthcoming.*​​
• 'The Hermit of the Lonely Loch', Daily Philosophy, 16 August 2024.
• 'Hánfēizǐ - A Chinese Philosophical Pessimist?', Daily Philosophy, 22 May 2024.​
• 'Taking Pessimism Seriously', Daily Philosophy, 11 May 2024.
• ‘Buddha’s Exact Teachings and the Paradox of Social Activism’, Sri Lanka Guardian, 13 May 2024.*
• ‘Should Buddhists Be Social Activists?’, Sri Lanka Guardian, 11 May 2024.
• ‘Social Consciousness in Buddhism’, Sri Lanka Guardian, 6 May 2024.
• 'Epistemic Injustice: Caution and Complexity', EPIC blog, 17 January 2025.
• 'Transhumanism and Misanthropy', Daily Philosophy, 1 December, 2 December.
• ‘Misanthropes – Literary and Philosophical’, review of Joseph Harris, Misanthropy in the Age of Reason, Daily Philosophy, 6 August 2022.
• ‘The hero’s story: To triumph over suffering: When the hero’s narrative undermines truthful and meaningful connections to others’, co-authored with Laura Blackie, Psychology Today, 10 July 2023. 
• Interview on Notts Today talking about the 'silencing' of patients, episode 207, Live Notts, 17 March 2023.*
• 'A Different Look at Buddhism', RE Today 40.2 (2023): 67.*
• 'Black women are at greater risk of maternal death in the UK - here's what needs to be done', The Conversation 1 June 2023.
• ‘Buddhism vs. Science’, Fortean Times 430 (2023): 40-33.
• 'Institutional Opacity and Trust', co-authored with Havi Carel, Open for Debate, 12 June 2023.​
• 'Medical gaslighting takes a toll on women's health', discusses some of my research, Re:solve Global Health, 18 April.
• ‘Should Epistemic Injustice Matter to Psychiatrists?’, co-authored with Ellie Harris and Lucienne Spencer, EPIC blog 24 May 2023.
• ‘Why Misanthropy?’, Anthony Morgan (ed.), What Matters Most: Conversations on the Art of Living (Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Agenda, 2023), 221-232.*
• 'Should Buddhists be Social Activists?', part 3, Daily Philosophy, 12 December 2022.
• 'Should Buddhists be Social Activists?', part 2, Daily Philosophy, 5 December 2022.
• 'Should Buddhists be Social Activists?', part 1, Daily Philosophy, 28 November 2022.
• ‘Hermeneutical Injustice and the Depths of Depression’, Renewing Phenomenological Psychopathology, 6 October 2022.*
• 'Loneliness is Many Things', Thinkful, 25 August 2022*
• ‘Shénnóng and the Agriculturalist School’, Daily Philosophy, 22 April 2022.
• '"Following the Science"? Some Feyerabendian reflections', Medium, 23 December 2021.
• 'Why Do People Resist EDI Initiatives?', Association of Medical Research Charities, 7 October.
• ‘Gardens of Refuge’, Daily Philosophy, 4 October 2021.​
• ‘Going Slow’, Daily Philosophy, 11 September 2021.
• 'Papers, Please! Vaccine Passports Are Not As Straightforward As You Think', The Critic (online) 21 June 2021.
• ‘Midgley on the 1980s Battle to Save Philosophy', In Parenthesis blog, 27 April 2021.
• 'Character, Vices, and Authority', The Philosopher spring issue (2021): 23-28.*
• ‘“We’re all Feyerabendians now!” Where science and society meet – The contemporary relevance of Paul K. Feyerabend (1924-1994)’, interviewed by Richard House, Self & Society 6 (2021): 1-23. ​
• ‘Let’s Open Up Debate About Lockdowns’, co-authored by Matthew Ratcliffe, The Critic (online) 19 November 2020.
• ​​‘Why it is Right to Question the Orthodox Covid-19 Narrative’, co-authored by Matthew Ratcliffe, The Critic (online) 6 November 2020.
• 'Welcome to Covidworld', co-authored with Matthew Ratcliffe, The Critic, 28 October 2020.
• ‘Foreword’, to Persian translation of Paul Feyerabend, The Tyranny of Science, translated by Mohsen Khadami, forthcoming.*
• ‘Antiscientism in Mary Midgley’, Mary Ellen Waite (ed.), Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers, https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/ecc/, forthcoming.
• ‘Scientism in Mary Midgley’, Mary Ellen Waite (ed.), Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers, https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/ecc/, forthcoming.
• A guest post for Open For Debate blog, forthcoming.*
• 'From Bad Thinking to Vice Epistemology', Imperfect Cognitions, 20 October 2020.*
• ‘Philosophical Misanthropy’, Philosophy Now August/September (2020): 22-25.*
• ‘From the Vicious Mind to the Scientific Mind’, De Filosoof (Utrecht University philosophy magazine) 79 (2020): 28-32.*
• ‘Science, Realism, and Unconceived Alternatives: Introduction to the Special Issue on Unconceived Alternatives’, Synthese 196/10 (2019): 3911–3913.
• ‘How Not To Overdo It: Trade-offs and Backfires in Curricular Diversification Efforts’, Diversity Reading List blog, May 2019.* 
• ‘Who Do We Invite? How to Improve Research Seminar Invitation Practices’, co-authored with Matthew Duncombe, APA Diversity and Inclusiveness blog, May 2019.
• ‘Pathophobia as the Social Oppression of Ill Persons’, Transculture blog, University of Wolverhampton, forthcoming 2019.*
• ‘Vices, Misanthropy, and Daoism’, podcast interview, Philosophy in Three Words, Royal Institute of Philosophy lecture series, University of Exeter, May 2019.*
• ‘Should You Write Articles on Marginal or Moribund Topics?’, blog post, Philosopher’s Cocoon 5 March 2019.
• ‘Being Good at Being Good at Philosophy’, guest blog post, Philosopher’s Cocoon, 20 February 2019. (Selected for Daily Nous ‘Mini-Heap’).
• ‘Unconventional Teaching Ideas That Work: Close Reading of Asian Philosophical Texts’, Philosopher’s Cocoon, 28 December 2018.*
• ‘Thinking as Complex as the World: An Obituary for Mary Midgley (1919-2018)’, online at the SWIP-UK, Feminist Philosophers, and Daily Nous websites, October 2018.
• ‘Mary Midgley on our Need for (Good) Philosophy’, Women in Parenthesis website, 26 November 2018.
• ‘You don’t need to know Plato and Aristotle to be a humanist’, co-authored with Helen de Cruz, Sophie Grace Chappell, and Dana Mills, The Guardian, 26 January 2018.
• ‘Hubris as Prime Ministerial Vice’, Open for Debate blog, July 2017*
• ‘Taking “Inner Beauty” Seriously’, Beauty Matters blog, July 2017.* 
• ‘Beautiful Souls’, The Philosopher vol. CV, no. 1 (2017): 20-23.*
• ‘Being Ill, Living Well’, Aeon | ideas and culture, 8 November 2016.*
• 'Vice-charging: Calling Out the Vices of the Mind', The Tablet (Biola University Centre for Christian Thought), 28 November 2016.*
• ‘Epistemic Vices – Conference Report’, The Reasoner 9.10 (2015): 85-86.*
• ‘Aggression, Virtue, and Philosophy’, Manifest Virtue blog, June 2015.*
• ‘Soul-making and Horrors’, Challenging Religious Issues: A Journal Supporting A-Level and Beyond 8 (2015): 14-18.*
• ‘Why should men care about gender inequality?’, Irish Times, 17 March 2015.*
• ‘Humility and History’, Think (Royal Institute of Philosophy) 13.38 (2014):  59-68.
• ‘Doing Away with Scientism’, Philosophy Now 102 (May/June 2014).
• ‘Can Illness Make Me A Better Person?’, Durham University Centre for Medical Humanities blog, February 2012, http://wp.me/p14fUh-Iv. *
• ‘Has Philosophy a Future?’, Critique 7 (2012): 3-5.*
• ‘Essay review of Paul Feyerabend, Against Method (London: Verso, 2010) and The Tyranny of Science (London: Polity, 2011)’, Philosophical Investigations 36 (2012): 90-94. 
• ‘Education, Virtues and Authenticity: The Case of Ernst Jünger, ‘Total Mobilisation’, and Academic Philosophy’, Discourse 10 (2011): 25-38. 
• ‘The Contingency of Science and the Future of Philosophy’, Eric Dietrich and Zach Weber (eds.), Philosophy’s Future: Essays in Philosophy 12.12 (2011): 312-328. 
• ‘Three Cheers for Science and Philosophy: Reflections on Hawking’s The Grand Design’, Think(Royal Institute of Philosophy) vol. 10(29) (2011):  37-41.
• ‘A Future without Science?’, The Philosopher 99.2 (2011).*
• ‘Historians of Science and the Research Excellence Framework’, Viewpoint (British Society for the History of Science), no. 91 (2010): 5. 
• ‘The True, the Good, and the Value of Science’, David Kirkby and Ulrich Reichard (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Durham-Bergen Postgraduate Philosophy Conference (2010): 47-55.
• ‘Virtue Epistemology, Metametaphysics and Philosophical Naturalism’, Michael Gabbay (ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the British Postgraduate Philosophy Conference, (London: Kings College Press, 2009), 81-89. 
• ‘Why Philosophy?’, Critique 1 (2009): 14-15.
• ‘Paul Feyerabend and ‘the Monster Science’’, Philosophy Now 74 (July/August 2009).
• ‘Specialization, Postgraduate Research, and Philosophical Eclecticism’, Discourse 7.2 (2008): 235-249.

 
Reviews

• Helen de Cruz, Wonderstruck: How Wonder and Awe Shape the Way We Think, Fortean Times 450 2024): 53.
• Adam Kirsch, The Revolt Against Humanity: Imagining a Future Without Us, Philosophy Now 159 (2023): 53-54.

•  Byung-Chul Han, The Philosophy of Zen Buddhism, Religious Studies 60.1 (2024): 189-191.*
• David E. Cooper, Animals and Misanthropy, Philosophy 98.3 (2023): 407-411.
• Rebecca Kondyk DeYoung, Glittering Vices, 2nd ed., Journal of Moral Philosophy 19 (2022) 527–557.
• Nicholas Bommarito, Inner Virtue, Philosophical Quarterly 69.276 (2019): 641–644.*
• Paul Feyerabend, Philosophy of Nature, Journal of Philosophy of History, 13 (2019): 281-285.*
• Mark Wynn, Renewing the Senses: A Study of the Philosophy and Theology of the Spiritual Life, Philosophical Quarterly 64.255 (2014): 356-358.
• Robert A. Hinde, Why Gods Persist: A Scientific Approach to Religion, European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 5.2 (2013).
• David E. Cooper, Convergence with Nature: A Daoist Perspective, Environmental Values 23.1 (2012): 386-388.
• Paul Feyerabend, The Tyranny of Science, British Journal for the History of Science 44.4 (2012): 576-577.
• Paul Feyerabend, Against Method, British Journal for the History of Science 44.2 (2012): 311-312.
• John Cottingham, The Spiritual Dimension: Religion, Philosophy, and Human Values, Philosophical Writings 38-39 (2008): 83-84.
• Stephen Napier, Virtue Epistemology: Motivation and Knowledge, Philosophical Writings.
• Dean Rickles, The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics, Philosophy in Review 30.3 (2010): 212-214.
• Harold Kincaid, John Dupré, Alison Wylie (eds.), Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions,Philosophical Writings, forthcoming. 
• James Ladyman and Don Ross, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalised, Philosophical Writings, forthcoming. 
• Anthony O’Hear, The Landscape of Humanity: Art, Culture, and Society, Philosophical Writings 34 (2007): 75-80.
• Sandra Harding, Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities, Metapsychology 13/31 (2009). 
• Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison, Objectivity, Philosophy in Review 29/ 3 (2009): 20-22. 
• Sahotr Sarkar, Doubting Darwin, Kaleidoscope 1 (2007).
• Geoffrey Scarre, Death, Fortean Times 227 (2007): 62.
• Gerard J. DeGroot, Dark Side of the Moon: The Magnificent Madness of the American Lunar Quest, Fortean Times 223 (2007): 60.
• Gary Lachmann, Discovering Swedenborg, Fortean Times 220 (2007).
• Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino, and C. Kenneth Waters (eds.), Scientific Pluralism, Philosophical Writings 33 (2006): 77-78. ​

Home

Publications

---

(A view, facing east, from the Higashiyama Jisho-ji, a Zen Buddhist temple and garden in Kyoto, November 2017).